Peter Snow
http://www.childsupportanalysis.co.uk/guest_contributions/snow_liability/index.htm
"When the "child of the family" provisions were introduced into Parliament in 1958 and 1960, Parliament was not informed about the significance of departing from the "liability to maintain": or the implications of State fraud against nonliable step-parents whose maintenance-order payments would abate national assistance or supplementary benefit entitlement."
"When the "child of the family" provisions were introduced into Parliament in 1958 and 1960, Parliament was not informed about the significance of departing from the "liability to maintain": or the implications of State fraud against nonliable step-parents whose maintenance-order payments would abate national assistance or supplementary benefit entitlement."
Comments
Post a Comment